{"id":830235,"date":"2026-08-15T01:09:03","date_gmt":"2026-08-15T01:09:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.abnewswire.com\/pressreleases\/?p=830235"},"modified":"2026-08-15T01:09:03","modified_gmt":"2026-08-15T01:09:03","slug":"solar-energy-storage-integration-guide-how-pv-battery-and-ev-charging-work-together","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.abnewswire.com\/pressreleases\/solar-energy-storage-integration-guide-how-pv-battery-and-ev-charging-work-together_830235.html","title":{"rendered":"Solar Energy Storage Integration Guide: How PV, Battery and EV Charging Work Together"},"content":{"rendered":"

Huizhou, Guangdong, China – August 15, 2026 –<\/strong> A typical 6 kW PV system paired with a 10–15 kWh LFP battery and a 7 kW single-phase EV charger can deliver 25–40 km of solar-only EV range per day. With TOU arbitrage and self-consumption optimization, integrated solar-plus-storage EV systems raise self-use rates from 30–40% (PV-only) to 70–90%, with payback periods of 5–8 years in most European and North American markets.<\/p>\n

Quick Answer\u25cf Comparison of the three mainstream PV + storage + charging integrated architectures (DC coupling, AC coupling, hybrid inverter) and selection decision logic \u25cf Principles for matching PV power, battery capacity, and charging pile power, along with quick calculation formulas \u25cf Energy flow directions and switching strategies for three operating modes: grid-connected, off-grid backup, and peak-valley arbitrage \u25cf Configuration plans for three typical scenarios: pure grid-connected, grid-connected with backup, and off-grid independent \u25cf OLINK PV + storage + charging integrated product matrix and common tips for avoiding pitfalls in project implementation<\/p>\n

As a manufacturer deeply rooted in the residential energy storage space, the most frequent question we encounter in field projects is how to make PV, storage, and EV charging work together smoothly. This guide is written from a B2B engineering procurement perspective—covering architecture, sizing ratios, mode switching, scenario planning, and compatibility—to help you deliver a complete home energy storage system solutions<\/a> proposal to your clients.<\/p>\n

Why Solar-Plus-Storage EV Charging Is Trending Now<\/p>\n

Across our conversations with EPCs and system integrators in both domestic and overseas markets, RFQs for integrated solar-storage-EV solutions have risen noticeably throughout 2024 and 2025. Three converging forces are driving this shift: rising electricity tariffs, surging EV adoption, and continuously falling PV module costs. When these three trends align, the integrated solution evolves from a nice-to-have into a must-have combination.<\/p>\n

Three Drivers Behind the Trend<\/p>\n

Retail electricity prices across major European and North American markets have increased by 30 to 60 percent over the past three years, making the economics of self-consumption increasingly attractive. Global residential EV ownership continues to climb, and homeowners plug in immediately upon return, creating a clear mismatch between daytime PV generation and nighttime charging demand, which in turn drives storage requirements. At the same time, lower module prices have shortened payback periods for residential PV installations, and when combined with storage and EV charging, the overall ROI improves further.<\/p>\n

Business Value for B2B Customers<\/p>\n

Upgrading from a standalone PV installation to a full PV-storage-EV package can increase project contract value by two to four times. While many installers offer PV-only services, far fewer can deliver a complete integrated solution, so technical capability becomes your competitive moat. EMS maintenance, battery capacity expansions, and charger upgrades generate ongoing after-sales and service income. Additionally, multiple markets offer ITC, rebates, net metering, and other policy support for integrated storage systems, and a bundled solution is easier to qualify for these incentives.<\/p>\n

Three Integration Architectures: DC-Coupled vs AC-Coupled vs Hybrid Inverter<\/p>\n

This is the first major decision in system selection. Each architecture has its own applicable scenarios. There is no absolute best, only what fits the project requirements: new build or retrofit, budget constraints, efficiency priorities, and future scalability. At OLINK, we support both hybrid inverter and AC-coupled pathways across our product lines, giving you the flexibility to choose based on project needs.<\/p>\n

DC-Coupled Architecture: How It Works<\/p>\n

In a DC-coupled architecture, both PV modules and the battery are connected to the DC side of a single hybrid inverter. This single inverter manages PV MPPT tracking, battery charging and discharging, and grid-tied inversion. PV-to-battery charging occurs directly on the DC bus without a second inversion stage, delivering higher efficiency. The advantages include high DC-side round-trip efficiency, typically 94 to 97 percent, with a single inverter handling all functions and fewer system components. The disadvantages are that PV and battery voltage levels must be matched, scalability is limited, and retrofitting existing PV installations is difficult. This architecture is best suited for new-build projects where PV and storage are installed simultaneously and maximum system efficiency is the priority.<\/p>\n

AC-Coupled Architecture: How It Works<\/p>\n

In an AC-coupled architecture, the PV inverter and battery inverter are independent units that interconnect on the AC side. PV-generated power is first inverted to AC, then converted back to DC via the battery PCS for charging, incurring an additional AC-to-DC conversion step. The advantages include high flexibility—batteries can be added to existing PV systems without affecting the original installation, and PV and storage can be scaled independently. The disadvantages are slightly lower round-trip efficiency, typically 88 to 92 percent, and the need for two inverters, which increases system cost modestly. This architecture is best suited for retrofitting storage into existing PV installations, phased investment projects, and applications requiring high expandability.<\/p>\n

Hybrid Inverter All-in-One Solution<\/p>\n

A hybrid inverter all-in-one can be understood as an upgraded, simplified DC-coupled implementation, integrating PV MPPT, battery BMS, grid-tied inverter, and even EV charge control into a single enclosure. OLINK’s hybrid inverter solution follows this approach: one master unit interfaces with PV, battery, grid, and loads, with EMS embedded onboard. The advantages include simple installation, minimal wiring, single-point maintenance, and competitive overall system cost. The disadvantages are that per-unit power ceiling is limited, larger systems require parallel connection of multiple units, and compatibility with third-party PV inverters requires protocol verification. This solution is best suited for new residential PV-storage-EV integrated installations where simplicity and reliability are top priorities.<\/p>\n

Architecture Selection Decision Tree<\/p>\n

For new installations with maximum efficiency as the priority, choose DC-coupled or hybrid inverter all-in-one. For existing PV with retrofitted storage, choose AC-coupled. For budget-sensitive residential applications, the hybrid inverter offers the best value for money. For future expansion and commercial or industrial applications, AC-coupled provides greater flexibility. If off-grid or backup functionality is required, the hybrid inverter supports more comprehensive off-grid logic. If your client is unsure which architecture to choose, refer to our residential energy storage systems product line, which covers hybrid inverters and high-voltage batteries from 5 kW to 30 kW.<\/p>\n

How to Size PV, Battery and EV Charger Power Ratios<\/p>\n

This is the most common category of inquiry we receive. Clients ask about an 8 kW PV installation and what battery capacity to pair with it, or whether to spec a 7 kW or 11 kW charger. There is no one-size-fits-all answer, but there are general principles and formulas you can use to provide quick estimates to your clients.<\/p>\n

Sizing Principles and Formulas<\/p>\n

PV array size determines daily generation. Average daily generation is approximately PV power in kilowatts multiplied by peak sun hours in hours. Central Europe receives about 3 to 4 peak sun hours per day, the US Southwest about 4.5 to 5.5 hours, and South China about 3.5 to 4.5 hours. Battery capacity determines how much energy can be stored for nighttime or cloudy use. Recommended battery capacity is at least 60 to 80 percent of average daily consumption for grid-tied backup scenarios, or at least 1.5 to 2 times average daily consumption for off-grid scenarios. Charger power determines EV replenishment speed. For residential applications, 7 kW single-phase already meets most daily needs, while 11 kW or 22 kW three-phase suits households with fast-charging requirements or multiple EVs. For grid-tied self-consumption with EV charging, a golden ratio applies: PV power in kilowatts to battery capacity in kilowatt-hours to charger power in kilowatts is approximately 2 to 3 to 4 to 1. For example, 6 kW PV paired with 10 to 15 kWh battery and 7 kW charger represents a well-balanced configuration.<\/p>\n

Sizing by Daily EV Driving Distance<\/p>\n

For daily driving of 30 to 50 kilometers, daily EV consumption is about 6 to 10 kWh, and 3 to 5 kW PV with 5 to 10 kWh battery is sufficient for basic coverage. For 50 to 80 kilometers per day, daily EV consumption is about 10 to 16 kWh, and 6 to 8 kW PV with 10 to 15 kWh battery is appropriate. For 80 to 120 kilometers per day, daily EV consumption is about 16 to 24 kWh, and 10 to 12 kW PV with 20 to 30 kWh battery is required to maintain high self-consumption rates. These figures assume household EV consumption of 15 to 20 kWh per 100 kilometers, and actual values vary by vehicle model, season, and driving habits.<\/p>\n

Golden Ratio of PV to Battery Capacity<\/p>\n

Based on our project data, for grid-tied self-consumption scenarios, a PV-to-battery ratio between 1:1.5 and 1:2.5 in kilowatts to kilowatt-hours is optimal. Below 1:1, the battery is undersized and PV curtailment increases. Between 1:1.5 and 1:2.5, the sweet spot, self-consumption rates reach 70 to 90 percent, covering the majority of projects. Above 1:3, the battery is oversized and frequently underutilized, wasting investment, and is typically suitable for backup or off-grid applications or where future load growth, such as a second EV, is anticipated.<\/p>\n

Grid-Tie \/ Off-Grid Switching and Operating Modes<\/p>\n

An integrated PV-storage-EV system does not operate in a single state. In actual operation, the system automatically transitions between grid-tied, off-grid backup, and TOU arbitrage modes, coordinated by the EMS. OLINK’s EMS supports millisecond-level grid-to-off-grid switching. During an outage, critical loads and EV charging are not interrupted, which is a significant user experience differentiator.<\/p>\n

Energy Flow in Grid-Tied Mode<\/p>\n

PV generation prioritizes self-consumption, including EV charging, and surplus charges the battery. After the battery is full, any excess PV is exported to the grid where net metering policies apply. When PV is insufficient, the battery discharges to supplement, and if the battery is also depleted, the grid supplies the deficit. EV charging priority is configurable. It can be set to PV-first to maximize free solar charging, or to scheduled full charge to ensure the vehicle is fully charged by departure time.<\/p>\n

Off-Grid \/ Backup Mode Trigger Conditions<\/p>\n

Trigger conditions include grid outage, voltage or frequency out of allowable range, or manual off-grid activation. OLINK’s hybrid inverter solution supports less than 20 milliseconds of switching time, so critical loads such as refrigerators, routers, and medical devices experience virtually no disruption. During off-grid operation, PV continues charging the battery while simultaneously powering critical loads and EV charging. When battery SOC drops to the configured lower limit, non-critical loads are shed. Upon grid restoration, the system automatically detects grid stability and smoothly reconnects to grid-tied mode when conditions are met, without manual intervention.<\/p>\n

TOU Arbitrage Strategy Settings<\/p>\n

During low-tariff periods, typically overnight, the grid charges the battery, and the EV can also charge using low-cost grid power if the customer accepts this. During high-tariff periods, typically evening or peak hours, the battery discharges to power household loads and EV charging, avoiding high-cost grid purchases. During PV production periods in daytime, the system prioritizes self-consumption and battery charging, with excess exported to the grid in net metering regions. Strategies can be adjusted seasonally and by tariff tables, and the EMS supports multi-period, multi-priority settings.<\/p>\n

Typical Scenario Configuration Solutions<\/p>\n

Below are three of the most common scenario-based configuration templates. You can use these directly for preliminary proposals to your clients. Fine-tuning based on local irradiance, electricity tariffs, and consumption patterns is always recommended, but these three packages cover over 80 percent of residential PV-storage-EV projects.<\/p>\n

Grid-Tied + Self-Consumption + EV Charging<\/p>\n

This configuration is applicable to areas with stable grids and net metering or self-consumption incentives. The typical configuration is 6 kW PV with 10 to 15 kWh LFP battery and 7 kW single-phase EV charger. The recommended architecture choice is the hybrid inverter all-in-one, offering the best value for money. Expected outcomes include a self-consumption rate of 70 to 85 percent, over 70 percent of EV charging from PV and battery, and a payback period of approximately 5 to 8 years.<\/p>\n

Grid-Tied with Backup (Unstable Grid Areas)<\/p>\n

This configuration is applicable to areas with occasional outages or high reliability requirements, such as Southeast Asia, parts of South America, and rural grid endpoints. The typical configuration is 8 to 10 kW PV with 20 to 30 kWh LFP battery and 7 to 11 kW EV charger. The recommended architecture choice is the hybrid inverter all-in-one with off-grid and black-start support. Expected outcomes include support for critical loads and EV slow-charging for 1 to 3 days during outages, depending on weather and consumption, with grid-to-off-grid transfer under 20 milliseconds.<\/p>\n

Off-Grid Standalone Solar-Plus-Storage EV System<\/p>\n

This configuration is applicable to remote areas without grid coverage, vacation cabins, farms, and remote communication sites. The typical configuration is 10 to 15 kW PV with 30 to 50 kWh LFP battery and 7 kW EV charger, with parallel units for capacity expansion. The recommended architecture choice is DC-coupled or hybrid inverter with off-grid control, with a diesel generator recommended as backup for extended cloudy periods. Expected outcomes include fully off-grid operation, 100 percent of EV charging from PV and battery, and reserve capacity for 3 to 5 consecutive cloudy or rainy days.<\/p>\n

Compatibility and Integration: Inverters, Chargers and EMS<\/p>\n

Many PV-storage-EV projects fail not because of poor product quality, but because compatibility was not verified upfront. Inverters may fail to communicate with batteries, chargers may not integrate with EMS, and monitoring apps may show PV data but not battery status. When designing a solution, protocol compatibility must be confirmed at the planning stage.<\/p>\n

Mainstream PV Inverter Brand Compatibility<\/p>\n

OLINK’s hybrid inverter solution has built-in PV MPPT, directly connecting to modules, so there are no compatibility concerns with third-party PV inverters. This is one of the key advantages of an all-in-one design. If the client already has a PV inverter from mainstream brands such as Huawei, Sungrow, SMA, SolarEdge, Growatt, or GoodWe, the AC-coupled approach allows the battery to connect independently on the AC side without affecting the existing PV system. For advanced scenarios requiring multi-brand orchestration, such as a PV inverter directly sending charge commands to the battery, integration is achieved via Modbus, RS485, or MQTT, and specific compatibility depends on the models involved.<\/p>\n

EV Charger Communication Protocol Compatibility<\/p>\n

Common protocols for charger-to-storage-system communication include OCPP 1.6 and 2.0, Modbus, MQTT, and various proprietary protocols. OLINK EMS supports integration with mainstream EV charger protocols, enabling dynamic power regulation that automatically adjusts charger output based on household load, PV generation, and battery state to prevent overload and tripping. For projects where the client already specifies a particular charger brand, we strongly recommend sharing the charger make and model with our technical team at the design stage to confirm compatibility and avoid on-site surprises.<\/p>\n

Role of the EMS Energy Management System<\/p>\n

The EMS is the brain of the integrated system, orchestrating PV, battery, charger, grid, and loads. Core functions include seamless grid-to-off-grid transfer, TOU arbitrage strategy execution, dynamic power allocation, SOC management, fault alarming, and remote monitoring. A well-designed EMS can improve system self-consumption rates by an additional 5 to 10 percentage points, while a poor EMS is merely a data display panel with manual-only strategy configuration. OLINK EMS supports a local and cloud dual architecture: local operation continues even when internet is down, and when connected, it enables remote monitoring and OTA upgrades.<\/p>\n

OLINK Solar-Plus-Storage EV Charging Product Solutions<\/p>\n

Having covered the general methodology, we now turn to OLINK’s own product offerings. As a Huizhou-based manufacturer with factory-direct supply, we specialize in integrated PV-storage-EV solutions, covering hybrid inverter all-in-ones and high and low-voltage batteries. We also support OEM and ODM customization and have provided private-label solutions to brands, EPCs, and system integrators for many years.<\/p>\n

Hybrid Inverter All-in-One Solution<\/p>\n

Power ratings available are 5 kW, 8 kW, 10 kW, and 12 kW, with both single-phase and three-phase options. The unit features dual MPPT inputs, supports high-voltage batteries from 100 to 400 V, and allows maximum PV input power up to 1.5 to 2 times inverter rated power. It supports grid-tied, off-grid, backup, and TOU arbitrage modes with millisecond-level grid-to-off-grid transfer. The embedded EMS integrates with mainstream EV chargers, enabling dynamic power allocation and PV-first EV charging logic. Full-chain production at our Huizhou factory is certified to ISO 9001, IEC 62109, IEC 61683, and other standards, ensuring stable and reliable delivery.<\/p>\n

15kWh Standard Configuration Use Cases<\/p>\n

The 15 kWh capacity tier is our best-selling segment, matching the PV-storage-EV needs of the majority of European and North American households. A 6 to 8 kW PV array paired with a 15kWh solar battery storage system<\/a> and a 7 kW charger delivers a well-balanced combination, covering daily household consumption and EV commuting without over-sizing the battery and extending the payback period unnecessarily. This configuration is suitable for a 3 to 4 person household with average daily consumption of 10 to 15 kWh and EV daily driving of 50 to 80 kilometers. The typical configuration is an 8 kW hybrid inverter all-in-one with 15 kWh LFP battery and 7 kW EV charger. The battery uses LFP cells with a cycle life of at least 6,000 cycles at 80 percent DOD and comes with a 10-year warranty. For detailed specifications, please refer to the 15kWh solar battery storage system<\/a> product page.<\/p>\n

30kWh Large Capacity Configuration Use Cases<\/p>\n

For larger homes, multi-EV households, or clients requiring extended backup runtime, our 30kWh solar plus storage system is the appropriate choice. With 30 kWh, the system provides roughly two days of full household consumption including EV slow-charging, ensuring peace of mind during outages. This configuration is suitable for 5-plus person households, multi-EV families, grid-unstable regions requiring backup, and small commercial or industrial applications. The typical configuration is a 10 to 12 kW hybrid inverter all-in-one with 30 kWh LFP battery and 11 kW EV charger. The modular design allows expansion from 15 kWh to 30 kWh or higher, making it easy to add battery modules later. For large-capacity system details, see the 30kWh solar plus storage system<\/a> product page.<\/p>\n

OEM\/ODM Customization Support<\/p>\n

We offer appearance customization including enclosure colors, silk-screened logos, and packaging design for full brand customization. Functional customization covers specific communication protocols, third-party brand integration, special power ratings, and custom EMS strategies. Software customization includes APP and cloud interface white-labeling, multi-language support, localized tariff models, and data API integration. We provide certification support to assist with CE, UL, VDE, G99, and other market-specific approvals. Our Huizhou factory maintains stable monthly output and supports both small-batch trial orders and large-volume shipments with reliable lead times.<\/p>\n

Common Pitfalls in Solar-Plus-Storage EV Projects<\/p>\n

Having been involved in numerous projects, we have accumulated a long list of lessons learned. Below are the most common problem areas we have identified. Addressing them proactively will save significant on-site commissioning time and after-sales costs.<\/p>\n

Incorrect capacity sizing is a frequent issue. Batteries may be undersized, causing PV curtailment, or oversized, leading to frequent under-charging. Always collect detailed consumption and EV usage data upfront and avoid guesswork. Wrong architecture selection is another common mistake. Forcing DC-coupled onto an existing PV installation results in prohibitively high retrofitting costs. AC-coupled may have slightly lower efficiency, but the retrofitting cost and risk are much smaller, so do not chase efficiency at all costs. Inadequate cable sizing is often overlooked. The combined current draw from the charger, inverter, and battery can exceed existing incoming line capacity. Perform a thorough electrical load calculation early and upsize cables or request service upgrades where necessary.<\/p>\n

Incompatible communication protocols can derail a project. The charger specified by the client may fail to communicate with the EMS, leading to on-site delays. Submit all equipment makes and models to your supplier for compatibility verification during the design phase. Grid-to-off-grid transfer failures are another critical issue. Transfer time may be too long, causing load drop-outs, or the inverter may error-shutdown after transfer. Choose a proven hybrid inverter solution. OLINK’s, for example, offers less than 20 milliseconds switching and has been validated across hundreds of installations. Non-compliant installation practices, such as improper battery series connections, non-compliant grounding, or inadequate ventilation and thermal management, affect battery life and can pose safety hazards. Use certified installation teams and strictly follow the installation manual. Finally, slow after-sales response is a major pain point. Integrated systems involve multiple equipment types including PV, storage, and charger, and when issues arise, each vendor blames the others. Choose a supplier capable of delivering a complete solution with a single point of contact for after-sales, which greatly improves efficiency.<\/p>\n

In summary, integrated PV-storage-EV solutions represent one of the fastest-growing segments in residential energy storage over the next three to five years. As an EPC or system integrator, building your home battery storage systems solution capability early will position you to capture the first wave of value in this rapidly expanding market.<\/p>\n

FAQ<\/p>\n

Q: Can a typical rooftop PV system fully charge an EV battery? A: A 6 kW rooftop PV system generates roughly 24 to 30 kWh per day at 4 to 5 peak sun hours, which is enough to add 120 to 200 km of EV range based on 15 to 20 kWh per 100 kilometers. For a 60 kWh EV battery, full recharge from solar alone typically requires two to three sunny days with a 6 kW array, or one day with a 10 kW-plus array.<\/p>\n

Q: What is the difference between DC-coupled and AC-coupled solar-plus-storage systems? A: DC-coupled systems connect PV and battery on the same DC bus through a hybrid inverter, achieving round-trip efficiency of 94 to 97 percent but with limited scalability. AC-coupled systems use separate PV and battery inverters that meet on the AC side, offering 88 to 92 percent efficiency but much greater flexibility for retrofits and expansion. Hybrid inverters combine both approaches in one unit.<\/p>\n

Q: How much battery capacity do I need for solar EV charging? A: As a rule of thumb, battery capacity in kilowatt-hours should be 1.5 to 2.5 times the daily EV energy consumption to ensure reliable overnight charging and one to two days of buffer. For 50 kilometers per day driving, roughly 8 to 10 kWh, a 10 to 15 kWh LFP battery works well. For 100 kilometers per day, roughly 15 to 20 kWh, choose 25 to 30 kWh. All OLINK LFP batteries offer at least 6,000 cycles at 80 percent DOD.<\/p>\n

Q: What is the typical payback period for a solar-plus-storage EV charging system? A: Payback ranges from 5 to 8 years in most European and North American markets, depending on local electricity rates, solar irradiance, available incentives including ITC, net metering, and rebates, and daily EV mileage. Systems with higher self-consumption rates of 70 to 90 percent and stronger TOU price spreads typically see shorter payback periods.<\/p>\n

Q: Can the system switch between grid-tied and off-grid mode automatically? A: Yes. Modern hybrid inverters like OLINK’s support seamless automatic transfer within less than 20 milliseconds when grid failure is detected. The EMS continuously monitors grid voltage and frequency. Once out of specification, it disconnects from the grid and powers critical loads and EV charging from PV and battery. When the grid stabilizes, it synchronizes and reconnects automatically.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/p>\n

The integration of PV, battery storage, and EV charging has matured into a commercially viable solution that delivers measurable economic and operational benefits. With self-consumption rates reaching 70–90% and payback periods of 5–8 years, the business case is clear. For B2B partners, success hinges on proper architecture selection, accurate system sizing, and robust EMS-driven energy management. OLINK offers vertically integrated, factory-direct solutions with full customization support to help you capture this rapidly growing market. The technology is proven, the economics are favorable, and the time to act is now<\/p>\n

About Olink<\/strong><\/p>\n

OLink is a global high-tech enterprise specializing in PV (solar) generation, energy storage, and EV charging integration. With over a decade of experience in the electrical and energy industries, we have built strong expertise in delivering smart, efficient, and scalable energy solutions.<\/p>\n

Media Contact<\/span>
Company Name:<\/strong> CMER of Olink New Energy Technology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.<\/a>
Contact Person:<\/strong> Media Relations
Email:<\/strong> Send Email<\/a>
Country:<\/strong> China
Website:<\/strong> https:\/\/www.pvpscs.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Huizhou, Guangdong, China – August 15, 2026 – A typical 6 kW PV system paired with a 10–15 kWh LFP battery and a 7 kW single-phase EV charger can deliver 25–40 km of solar-only EV range per day. With TOU arbitrage … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[401,410,403,404,416],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-830235","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Business","category-Manufacturing-Industry","category-UK","category-US","category-World"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abnewswire.com\/pressreleases\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/830235","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abnewswire.com\/pressreleases\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abnewswire.com\/pressreleases\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abnewswire.com\/pressreleases\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abnewswire.com\/pressreleases\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=830235"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.abnewswire.com\/pressreleases\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/830235\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.abnewswire.com\/pressreleases\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=830235"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abnewswire.com\/pressreleases\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=830235"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.abnewswire.com\/pressreleases\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=830235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}