From 2008 to 2014, the U.S. saw blade and handtool market showed mixed dynamics. A significant drop in 2009 was followed by recovery growth over the next three years, until the market decreased again. In 2014, the market resumed growth, reaching 8,785 million USD, which was the peak level recorded over the period under review.
U.S. saw blade and handtool manufacturing illustrated mixed dynamics over the last few years. The plunge of 2009 was followed by positive dynamics in production. However, manufacturing resumed its decline falling short of reaching the pre-crisis level. In 2014, production stood at 5,715 million USD, increasing slightly.
Saw blade and handtool manufacturing is still in the recovery phase of the economic cycle. Saw blade and handtool output has to grow another 13% in order to reach the pre-recession production level achieved in 2007.
The market is defined by the growing presence of imports, with an import share of 75% in market sales in 2014. The industry should keep growing at moderate paces in foreseeable future, but demand and revenue will bounce back after a challenging period. Renewed construction and stronger consumer sentiment will contribute to this growth. However, key input prices will also increase, so operators will need to raise prices to maintain profit margins. Price-based competition from less expensive imports has boosted the volume of foreign goods as a share of domestic demand.
China, Germany and Japan were the main suppliers of saw blades and handtools into the U.S., with a combined share of 56% of total U.S. imports in 2015. However, the fastest growing supplier was the Republic of Korea (+10.2% per year) from 2007 to 2015. China strengthened its position in the U.S. import structure, from 32% in 2007 to 37% in 2015. By contrast, Japan saw its share reduced to 9%.
U.S. exports of saw blades and handtools experienced robust growth since 2009. The export growth rates were higher than those of production and consumption. As U.S. companies improved their positions on overseas markets, domestic manufacturers enjoyed a new growth driver.
In 2015, the main destinations of U.S. saw blade and handtool exports were Canada (26%) and Mexico (17%). The share exported to Mexico increased (+6 percentage points), while the share sent to Japan illustrated negative dynamics (-5 percentage points).
Net U.S. imports of saw blades and handtools showed a negative trend since 2009. In 2015, this industry ran a significant trade deficit of 3,351 million USD, approximately 49% of gross imports. This deficit could grow substantially in the years to come.
Follow the link below to review a free sample or to buy the report: http://www.indexbox.co.uk/store/us-saw-blade-and-handtool-market-analysis-and-forecast-to-2020/
“U.S. Saw Blade And Handtool Market. Analysis And Forecast to 2020” provides an in-depth analysis of the U.S. saw blade and handtool market. It presents the latest data of the market size and volume, domestic production, exports and imports, price dynamics and turnover in the industry. In addition, the report contains insightful information about the industry, including industry life cycle, business locations, productivity, employment and many other crucial aspects. The Company Profiles section contains relevant data on the major players in the industry.
Countries coverage: the U.S.
- Market size;
- Domestic production, value of shipments;
- Key market players and their profiles;
- Exports, imports and trade balance;
- Import and export prices;
- Forecast of the market dynamics in the medium term;
- Key industry statistics;
- Life cycle of the industry;
- Number of establishments and their locations;
- Employment data;
- Industry productivity.
Product coverage: Mechanics’ hand service tools; Edge tools, hand-operated; Dies and interchangeable cutting tools, for machines and power-driven handtools; All other miscellaneous handtools; Precision measuring tools (inspection, quality control, tool room, and machinists’); Saw blades and handsaws; Saw blade and handtool manufacturing, nsk, total
Companies mentioned: Klein Tools, Apex Tool Group, The L S Starrett Company, NDC Technologies, Dmg Mori Usa, Channellock, International Knife & Saw, The M K Morse Company, Irwin Industrial Tool Company, Wright Tool Company, Daniels Manufacturing Corporation, Total Component Solutions Corporation, Lisle Corporation, Jore Corporation, Creed-Monarch, Mr. Longarm, Seymour Midwest, Estwing Manufacturing Company, Wallboard Tool Co., Ziemann’s Vision, Energizer Personal Care, Western Forge, The Ames Companies, Kingsley Tools, Clopay Ames True Temper Holding Corporation, Specialty Products of Greenwood, Missouri, Garden Pals, Buffington & Associates , Linamar Holding Nevada, Idsc Holdings, Bc Mountain Holdings
Why buy “U.S. Saw Blade And Handtool Market. Analysis And Forecast to 2020”?
- Get the full picture of the market
- Assess future market prospects
- Identify key success factors affecting the market
- Adjust your marketing strategy
- Ready your business for future trends
3 easy ways to order
- Follow the link below to review a free sample or to buy the report: http://www.indexbox.co.uk/store/us-saw-blade-and-handtool-market-analysis-and-forecast-to-2020/
- Call us +44 20 3239 3063 to discuss your information needs and for special discounts on multi-report orders
- Email your order to firstname.lastname@example.org
Price: 1490 EUR for Single License
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.1 REPORT DESCRIPTION
1.2 REPORT STRUCTURE
1.3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2.1 KEY FINDINGS
2.2 MARKET TRENDS
3. MARKET OVERVIEW
3.1 MARKET VALUE
3.2 TRADE BALANCE
3.3 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES
3.4 MARKET FORECAST TO 2020
4. DOMESTIC PRODUCTION
4.1 PRODUCTION IN 2008-2015
4.2 PRODUCTION BY TYPE
4.3 PRODUCTION BY STATE
4.4 PRODUCER PRICES
5.1 IMPORTS IN 2007-2015
5.2 IMPORTS BY TYPE
5.3 IMPORTS BY COUNTRY
5.4 IMPORT PRICES BY COUNTRY
6.1 EXPORTS IN 2007-2015
6.2 EXPORTS BY TYPE
6.3 EXPORTS BY COUNTRY
6.4 EXPORT PRICES BY COUNTRY
7. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
7.1 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOTS
7.2 INDUSTRY LIFE CYCLE
7.3 BUSINESS LOCATIONS
7.5 ANNUAL PAYROLL
7.6 INDUSTRY PRODUCTIVITY
7.7 ESTABLISHMENT SIZE AND LEGAL FORM
8. COMPANY PROFILES