Does the ‘free speech’ notion hold an absolute value anywhere…? Even in the western culture…? Can ‘freedom of expression’ be meant for; over-riding the humane and ethical deeds—sabotaging the entire ethico-moral codes—bulldozing the whole cross-communal or inter-ethnic human values system…? These are some thorny questions posed over to the mind that holds some rationality, any sense of right and wrong, or at least, a more or less conscience or some scruples of righteousness within one’s self.
Exercising ‘free speech’, that may ardently injure or sensitively indignant a certain ethnicity, is criminalized. Henceforth, the sacrileges and profanities crossing all the limits of ethical or moral codes and even humanity-based values, cannot, by any means or on any account, be rationalized to be permissible or tolerable to mutilate, harm and detriment the inter-ethnic peace of global communities by planting the seeds of hatred abhorrence or tarnished blasphemies…???
There exists nowhere in the world where licenses can be granted that one can flagrantly say and blatantly express whatever he or she likes to; but reasonably, there are certain limits that one is supposed to be within.
However, pretty conversely, the kind of the ‘moral trait-outlook’ manifested by certain vagrants and nomad quarters, on the face of ‘free speech’, is neither explicable nor justifiable on the least of any judicial, moral, ethical or humanitarian accounts!
Advocating for open license to the ‘free speech’ and spreading the dogma-notion behind this, is nothing, but a clumsily and maladroitly ‘disgraceful enough’ modality of ridiculous manifestations by deflated societies, having no acclimatization of moral perspectives.
While advocating the tarnished-hatred, apparently, the ‘tender-keepers’ of free speech, along with their biased and discriminatory partisan means, present certain devious and deceitful arguments in wrapped misconceptions and logical fallacies, however when it reaches to the end of the tether or the commonsense truss-leash, one can easily comprehend and realize that are these reason-indexes actually so, as they are dogmatized to appear or opinionated to spread out? Do these jargons and verbiages certainly provide some justifiable grounds for a ‘free speech’ without any limits? With an absolute value…? Especially when it comes to the sensitivities-based sentiments…? These are the questions, that are serious-enough in their nature. Not only questions, but, in a literal sense the morality-probes for a considerate mind that can hold to the state of affairs, when it comes to moral convictions. and henceforth, are to be dealt with great trepidations.
(Extracts taken from: ‘Ethico-Moral Fallacies’ and the ‘Free Speech Dogma’ by Dr. Bareera N.B.)
‘Freedom of Speech’ is the narrative that is vastly and quite pretentiously used by certain quarters, to not only validate, but justifiably vindicate the blasphemies. The notion of an ‘absolute free speech’ serves as the basic ‘construct-version of interpretation’ for the nefarious motives behind blasphemous acts.
Today’s talk of the town, “Pamela Geller has an ‘absolute right’ to free speech”, say many people so senselessly and inconsiderately, that it appears as if one has never paused for a moment and thought of the essential implications for what he or she is stating or asserting of.
So thoughtlessly, not only the public, but also many of the so-called communal ‘opinion-builders’ are onto the ‘dogma’, they aren’t even aware of the far-reaching corollary repercussions, its consequential upshots and the socio-moral reverberations associated thereto.
The remarkable argumentative confrontation of an ‘absolute free speech’ by the NPA’s anthropological analyst from SAARC region, Dr. Bareera N. B. has staunchly debunked, deplored and denounced the shameful appalling behind the reprehensible defiance by AFDI’s Pamela Geller, that she has manifested in the name of free speech so far, which is nothing but her fervidly eager desperations, once again on board to gain ‘cheap publicity’.
No need to mention, Pamela Geller has an evident track record for stoking up the flames of ethnic hate and promoting hatred content and abhorrence that is progressively proceeding towards austere racial hatred revulsions and animosity conflicts.
She has got notorious escalations in promoting ethnic hate through heavy-funded networks of racial activism throughout the globe. No need to mention, Geller has long continued to push hatred, revulsive and rhetoric pomposity through her writings, magniloquence and a series of transit ads.
After having due considerations of Anders Behring Breivik’s case (the Norwegian drastic radical, who in 2011, became responsible for murdering 76 persons during a shooting rampage, and cited Pamela Geller in his manifesto), the AFDI was labelled as a ‘hate group’ by the UK authorities.
Company Name: SAARC Anti-blasphemy Commission
Contact Person: Lt. Col. Azhar Saleem
Email: Send Email